Yes, I am still opposing the Microsoft Tax, or the fact that computers are not sold separately from their operating systems. With an unshakable duopoly bordering on a monopoly, this is exactly one of the few cases where government should intervene in business. As already Adam Smith pointed out, businessmen can hardly get together without conspiring against their customers. For the market to function as intended, monopolies and non-competing duopolies must be broken.
How would you react if you could not buy a car without buying insurance from a particular company? If they told you, "sure you can get insurance elsewhere, but you still have to prepay this one first and you won't get it refunded." Not happy, I think. Why should PC users be more tolerant?
Putting my credit card where my keyboard is, I have ordered a MS-free netbook (Acer Aspire One) while they still exist. Because the only way for me to encourage MS-free computers is to buy them. (Those of you who are politically active may have other channels, but I am not destined for that.) According to Wikipedia, "Acer has stated that it will be pushing Linux aggressively on its new laptops and notebooks." One may hope that today's economic climate will boost this, but who knows. In any case, I am vindictive today. Besides, my tooth is already dead so a new computer is in order. This will be for the commute - I have none in that weight range today, except my pocket PC/mobile phone. (Which incidentally runs Windows and cost a lot more.)