Magnus Itland (itlandm) wrote,
Magnus Itland
itlandm

Norway's carbon confusion

Binge and purge (The Economist)
This story expands on my earlier comments about Norway's double attitude toward the environment. As one of the world's leading exporters of oil and gas, it is "responsible" for much of the global warming. On the other hand, local stardards are extremely strict, with taxes on cars and fuel that make the hairs stand up on foreign visitors, and with massive investments in green technologies.

As other countries become more advanced, they too will face many of the same things. America under Obama will presumably be looking in this direction, for instance. Other Nordic countries and the Netherlands are already doing much of the same.

Deploying environmental measures in developing countries looks like a great idea at first glance. The scope for improvement is enormous there, but pitifully small at home. And developing countries need the money and the transfer of technology. I agree - but the number of countries available is less than it seems.

The reason poor countries remain poor long after the end of overt colonialism is largely that they have retained a culture of deceit and betrayal, or are engaged in various level of ethnic war. Investing in such places is worse than nothing, certain to either line the money of corrupt officials or finance the military of one or the other warring faction.
Tags: economy, politics
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments