Magnus Itland ([info]itlandm) wrote,
@ 2008-07-06 13:45:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current location:Nodeland

"Humans are obviously unique.
But it's suprisingly hard to say why" says the front page of New Scientist 24. May 2008.

Yes, it must be very hard if you're a fundie materialist, because the thing that makes humans unique is our ability to send our mind away from the material plane to visit lower and higher worlds. This superpower is what we call "imagination", but unfortunately it has a bit of an undeserved bad rep. But without it we would not just be deprived of porn and soap operas and The Sims, we would also lack religion, matemathics and other forms of science that require us to first guess the unknown before we can use it to understand the known.

By "lower worlds" I mean the worlds we create, such as daydreams or computer games. By "higher worlds" I mean the worlds that create us, such as matemathics and perennial religion. The lower worlds are easy to change but woefully temporary. The higher worlds are longer lasting than the daily world, but painfully hard and unyielding.

Because higher and lower worlds are both accessed by imagination, it is not always obvious which is which. Take great art, for instance. Some of the Cro-Magnon cave paintings still radiate a strange beauty/power after more than 10 000 years, especially to those who see them firsthand or who have an artistic disposition themselves. On a shorter time scale, Bach and Beethoven are long gone from this world, but the beauty they brought here remains. Verticalists will say that these works are a form of "revelation", which is (broadly speaking) content from a higher world being channeled into ours (or even further, into worlds we create, thus lifting them up to or beyond our own). The concept is borrowed from religion, so your vocabulary may vary.

In any case, this is what makes humans unique. There are birds able to make tools, different from but on a similar scale of complexity as the handaxes our ancestors used 100 000 years ago. But to the best of our knowledge, no animal can follow us into the higher and lower worlds, through the doorways of imagination.



(Post a new comment)


[info]lighthawk
2008-07-06 04:44 pm UTC (link)
That is an impressive aspect of the human species. An evolutionary accident I would imagine.

Actually, I would not be surprised if there were some other animals with that level of cognitive power. Dolphins and some whales actually come to mind. They just use it in a completely different way than we do if that is the case.

I think it's a combination of our ability to see the world beyond ourselves and ask "why" along with our abilities to communicate in multiple ways and use tools that make humans the species we are today.

It's actually one of the last remaining aspects of existence that keeps me an agnostic rather than a full atheist. While not perfect, that combination is far and way superior to every other animal on the planet. Even our closest evolutionary relatives (the chimps) have only a small fraction of that ability. Their ability to think is a bit more primitive, lesser motor functions, and their vocal range is much smaller than ours. So while I refuse to believe in a god in the traditional Christian belief, I can't help but wonder if humanity had a guiding hand along the way.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]itlandm
2008-07-06 05:58 pm UTC (link)
I don't think this is a question of pure brain processing power (which dolphines, whales and even elephants have on the same scale as us, some possibly more).

By all accounts, our ancestors 100 000 years ago lacked this aperture of imagination, whereas even children today are amazingly creative.

Perhaps it is related to the infinite feedback loop, with which we are able to pick up our own thoughts before expressing them, and then sending them back in for further processing.

Perhaps it is related to language, but not all people always imagine in words. Many imagine in very detailed pictures, and some in music. So probably not quite that simple. Perhaps we had language well before we began to imagine, but there just wasn't much to talk about. After all, how much do you need to say when no one has any imagination? We could not even have had this discussion.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…